Explore
This article is from
Journal of Creation 21(3):1–2, December 2007

Browse our latest digital issue Subscribe
Journal of Creation Volume 21(3) Cover

Journal of Creation archive > Volume 21 Issue 3

Journal of Creation

Volume 21, Issue 3
Published December 2007
127 pages

Click here to subscribe to the Journal of Creation

PDF icon

Click on the PDF icons below to view any of these articles as a PDF in a new window. You can save the PDF to your computer from there or right click on the icon below and click on ‘save target as’ (or similar).

Contents:

Page

Title

3–5
Fossil embryos deep in the fossil record
Fossil embryos deep in the fossil record
Perspective by Michael J. Oard
5–6
Big birdosaur blues: new fossil creates problems for dino-to-bird evolution
Big birdosaur blues: new fossil creates problems for dino-to-bird evolution (Pre-publication)
Perspective by Shaun Doyle
6–8
Naracoorte Caves: an archive in the dark
Naracoorte Caves: an archive in the dark
Perspective by Emil Silvestru
8–11
Katrina’s splay deposits: a small example of the power of flowing water
Katrina’s splay deposits: a small example of the power of flowing water
Perspective by Tas Walker
11–12
Feathery flight of fancy: alleged ‘protofeathers’ fail under close scrutiny
Feathery flight of fancy: alleged ‘protofeathers’ fail under close scrutiny
Perspective by Shaun Doyle
12–14
Migrating planets and migrating theories
Migrating planets and migrating theories
Perspective by Wayne Spencer
15–16
Evolutionary origin of life even more difficult
Evolutionary origin of life even more difficult
Perspective by Michael J. Oard
17
No more love for Lucy?
No more love for Lucy? (Pre-publication version)
Perspective by Ryan Jaroncyk
18
Terrible lizards trapped by terrible Flood
Terrible lizards trapped by terrible Flood
Perspective by Tas Walker
19–23
Astronomical troubles for the astronomical hypothesis of ice ages
Astronomical troubles for the astronomical hypothesis of ice ages
Overview by Michael J. Oard
24–26
Evidence for turtle evolution
Evidence for turtle evolution
Overview Jerry Bergman and Wayne Frair
27–31
Florid forensic fable
Florid forensic fable
A review of The Making of the Fittest: DNA and the Ultimate Forensic Record of Evolution by Sean B. Carroll
Book Review by Alex Williams
32–36
Still discontent
Still discontent
A review of Darwinism and Its Discontents by Michael Ruse
Book Review by Lael Weinberger
37–43
Sloppy, lazy and dishonest
Sloppy, lazy and dishonest
A review of Science and Faith: Friends or Foes? by C. John Collins
Book Review by Andrew Kulikovsky
44–46
Strong case, but flawed by compromise
Strong case, but flawed by compromise
A review of The Case for a Creator by Lee Strobel
Book Review by Lita Sanders
47–52
String Theory—causing a disturbance of cosmic proportions
String Theory—causing a disturbance of cosmic proportions
A review of The Cosmic Landscape by Leonard Susskind
Book Review by Mary Beth De Repentigny
52–54
A pathetic case for an old earth
A pathetic case for an old earth
A review of A Biblical Case for an Old Earth by David Snoke
Book Review by Lita Sanders
55–57
The HAR1F gene: a Darwinian paradox
The HAR1F gene: a Darwinian paradox
Countering the Critics Article by Peer Terborg and Royal Truman
58–60
The Flood/post-Flood boundary
The Flood/post-Flood boundary
Letter to the Editor by Max J. Hunter. Reply: Michael Oard
60–61
WMAP ‘noisy’ data?
WMAP ‘noisy’ data?
Letter to the Editor by James Upton
61
Biblical chronology—our times are in his hands
Biblical chronology—our times are in his hands
Letter to the Editor by Larry Pierce. Reply: Mike Viccary
61–62
The problems of traditional chronology
The problems of traditional chronology
Letter to the Editor by Rod Bernitt
62–66
‘Short’ sojourn comes up short?
‘Short’ sojourn comes up short?
Letter to the Editor by Brenton Minge. Replies: Mike Viccary and David Austin
66–68
Pioneer anomaly: still unsolved?
Pioneer anomaly: still unsolved?
Letter to the Editor by James Upton. Reply: Russell Humphreys
68
Tidal considerations
Tidal considerations
Letter to the Editor by Jack C. Sofield. Reply: JoC Editors
69–76
Days 1&ndash
Days 1–4
Viewpoint by Frank DeRemer, Mark Amunrud and Delmar Dobberpuhl
77–83
Life’s irreducible structure—Part 2: naturalistic objections
Life’s irreducible structure—Part 2: naturalistic objections
Paper by Alex Williams
84–92
Genetic code optimisation: Part 2
Genetic code optimisation: Part 2
Paper by Royal Truman and Peer Terborg
93–101
On literary theorists’ approach to Genesis 1: Part 2
On literary theorists’ approach to Genesis 1: Part 2
Paper by Marc Kay
102–110
Haeckel: legacy of fraud to popularise evolution
Haeckel: legacy of fraud to popularise evolution
Paper by Pauli J. Ojala and Matti Leisola
111–117
Astonishing DNA complexity demolishes neo-Darwinism
Astonishing DNA complexity demolishes neo-Darwinism
Paper by Alex Williams
118–127
Why the shared mutations in the Hominidae exon X GULO pseudogene are not evidence for common descent
Why the shared mutations in the Hominidae exon X GULO pseudogene are not evidence for common descent
Paper by Royal Truman and Peer Terborg