Tardigrades too tough for evolution
Sometimes scientists are so enthralled by the wonders of the nitty-gritty, they forget what’s really at issue.
Biologos fails with Is Genesis History critique
A big failure.
Is the Bible one book or 66?
Our answer to this question affects how we interpret the Bible.
Reading the Bible and understanding nature
A review of The Bible, Protestantism, and the Rise of Natural Science by Peter Harrison
Compromising chaplain castigates creation, round 2
A school chaplain takes issue with our previous comments.
ET needed evolution
There's something ET needed more than a spaceship, in order to reach Earth. And Charles Darwin provided it.
‘Creation is faith; evolution is science’?
It’s often claimed that evolution—not biblical creation—is evidence-based science; the truth is very different.
The Neandertal mitochondrial genome
It does not support evolution
Biblical reasons to affirm the creation days were 24 hour periods
There are sound biblical reasons to interpret the days of creation as normal-length days.
The Red Sea Crossing: can secular science model miracles?
Can secular scientists really investigate the parting of the waters that allowed the Israelites to escape the Egyptians?
Using Bible history to interpret the rocks and landscapes
A powerful way to change your view of the world.
Let the blind see …
Breeding blind fish with blind fish restores sight for many of them—but should evolutionists be crowing?