Jesus’ miracles showed His power over creation—no need for evolution.

Many passages in Scripture require Adam to be historical. Among them is Romans 5:12–21, where a historical Adam is contrasted with the historical Jesus.

Despite claims to the contrary, the meaning of yôm in Genesis is not in doubt.

What would it take to get you to disbelieve Christianity? One author ‘puts it on the line’ as to why the evolutionary ‘big picture’ so violently contradicts the Gospel.

Why does six-day creation matter? How can we refute old-earth compromisers?

Here are nine simple questions to ask your future possible pastor, youth group leader or Bible College principal to find out their view of Genesis.

We hope you enjoy this sneak preview of an article from the soon-to-be-released Creation magazine. Subscribers will be delighted with the printed magazine’s powerful content and brilliant graphics.

Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it. But what would happen if there were no history to learn from?

The Sydney Anglicans are rightly respected for their stand on biblical authority. But a recent affiliated publication calls for seeing Genesis as ‘figurative’.

Soft gappers claim Gen. 1:1–2 refers to creation of stars, galaxies and the matter of the earth, and v. 3–31 to forming and filling of earth billions of years later.

The June 2003 issue of the leading Pentecostal magazine Charisma featured a shocking cover story, an error-filled puff piece about the leading ‘progressive creationist’ Hugh Ross plus a hatchet job on biblical (‘young earth’) creation.

Skeptics claim that the order of creation in Genesis 2 is different to that in chapter 1. But is it?